🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Along the coast lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.