🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an celebration that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between global Black communities, has taken on a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate functions where African descendants are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of showcasing anti-racist commitment. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has crested, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what raising awareness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in winter, but also in autumn in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since those days, placing less emphasis on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the celebration is observed is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how appropriation leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the current time in which it occurs this year. In the United Kingdom, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Conservative party, is a firm opponent of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a situation where a legislator gains confidence to say that “not seeing any white faces” in certain urban areas is a reason for concern. At the same time, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a complete entity.

In the America, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A campaign to remove Black history and narrative from the historical documents is under way. One of the former president's early administrative commands targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month illustrates how little it can be effective if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the current era. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the month. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend efforts for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a difficult task. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and tradition of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – constitute an framework that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a era that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for people, particularly the younger generation, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the past when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who mark it should not be reassured with the passive language of implicit prejudice and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and adaptive. Maybe an entire name rebrand is necessary – Black History is Now Month.